JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 28, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Gustavo Hernández Salazar

✓
Topic · hard data
Recusacion Contra La Totalidad De Los Miembros De La Corte Constitucional. Mediante Auto 187 El Ciudadano Gustavo Hernández Salazar Solicita Se Declare La Nulidad Del Auto 187 De 2005 Por Considerar Que Las Recusaciones Debian Ser Resueltas Por La Sala Plena Y Que Ello No Ocurrio Asi, En Razon A Que Ese Dia El Magistrado Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra No Estaba Presente. Denegada La Solicitud De Nulidad
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad De Auto Que Niega Recusacion En Proceso De Constitucionalidad
  • Negada por existencia de quórum decisorio y deliberatorio
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Denegar la solicitud de nulidad presentada por el ciudadano Gustavo Hernandez Salazar en contra del Auto 187 de 2005 (6 de septiembre) de la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional.
  2. Segundo. Incorporese al expediente D-5625 el original de esta providencia e insertese copia en los demas procesos que actualmente se tramiten en contra del Acto Legislativo 02 de 2004.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.